PMO Press Statement on the Propriety of Responses by Civil Servants
Prime Minister's Office
Foreign affairs
Governance
25 June 2014
This article has been migrated from an earlier version of the site and may display formatting inconsistencies.
This is in response to media queries over the propriety of recent letters by the Prime Minister’s press secretary to the Economist magazine, and the Singapore Consul-General in Hong Kong to the South China Morning Post.
The Economist article was on the Government’s Central Provident Fund policies. It referred to PM’s defamation suit over an allegation that the PM had misappropriated public moneys. When aspersions are cast on the integrity of the Prime Minister and his Government’s policies, an official reply from the PM’s press secretary is completely in order. This is no different from what press secretaries in most other Governments do.
Likewise, when a foreign newspaper carries an article with misrepresentations about Singapore, it is important that our diplomatic representative defend Singapore’s interests by correcting misrepresentations and providing a balanced view. Our Consul-General in Hong Kong did just that when he responded to the South China Morning Post article.
* * * * *
PRIME MINISTER'S OFFICE
SINGAPORE
25 JUNE 2014
Explore related topics
